A verdict you can audit
The score shows its working.
- Published, versioned weights: read the exact share of every axis
- Per-axis confidence, labelled where the data is thin
- Solvency and earnings-quality checks shown beside the score, never blended in
Switch
Keep the screening and the research depth. Add a score you can audit line by line, and one that knows what’s already in your portfolio.
Free full access during early access. No card required.
The difference
Rating tools compress a company into one number. So do we, but we show the working, and we measure it against the book you already hold.
A verdict you can audit
A verdict that knows your book
Side by side
What actually differs is how much each tool discloses, and whether it can see your holdings at all.
| What you’re comparing | ScalableWealth | Typical rating tool |
|---|---|---|
| The weights behind the score | Published and versioned: read the share of each axis | Rarely disclosed |
| When the data is thin | Per-axis confidence, labelled ("low confidence, 1 analyst") | Usually one number, the same size regardless |
| Solvency and earnings-quality checks | Shown beside the score (Altman Z band, Beneish M flag) | Often folded silently into the rating |
| How valuation is framed | A modelled fair-value range with its assumptions on show (early access), plus bands against the stock’s own 5-year history and its sector | Commonly a single fair-value figure |
| Whether it reads your portfolio | Diversification, concentration and ETF overlap vs your book | Not portfolio-aware |
| Whether the score’s accuracy is tracked in public | Quarterly information-coefficient (IC) decay, published as it accrues | Rarely published |
“Typical rating tool” describes common patterns in retail research products, based on their public methodology. The ScalableWealth column maps to features you can use today.
You keep everything you came for
Switching isn’t a downgrade. The tools you screen and research with are here, and the score sits inside them.
Screener
A 150+ field registry, ranked by the score by default. Share a screen as a URL, start from curated screens with their methodology disclosed, and compare two to four names side by side.
Research depth
Financial-statement history in its reporting currency, analyst estimates with surprise history, valuation bands versus the stock’s own record and its sector, peer cohorts, and ETF look-through.
Grounded AI
Ask about any section of a stock’s page and get an answer with sources you can click. Describe a screen in words and it proposes the criteria; you run them, never a silent query. Compare names with the working shown.
What a research-only tool can’t give you
Research tools rate the market. They don’t hold your book, so they can’t tell you what a name does to it. We can.
How it fits
Before you buy, see the diversification delta, the concentration it adds, and how much it overlaps the ETFs you already hold. Reachable from every instrument.
Optimizer
The optimizer starts from your current weights, not a blank sheet, so a proposal is a move from where you are, not a portfolio built in a vacuum.
Alerts
Get alerted when a score changes, when a name enters or leaves one of your screens, or when a company files new financial results.
Said plainly
Where analyst coverage is thin, our confidence label says so instead of inventing precision. Today the score ranks around 880 investable ASX names (measured on production, July 2026) and the US large-cap universe: the S&P 500, the NASDAQ-100 and the largest US ETFs, with full price history and nightly updates. Your AUD portfolio can hold those US names, valued in Australian dollars at trade-date exchange rates. And we take you to a decision, then hand it back: we propose, you decide, we never place orders.
Early access
Full access to the platform, free during early access. No card required.